Participation / Open to disagreement

Bring your own
starting point.

Propose a Book, challenge the Tablet, or respond to a Trial. Begin with an argument you are willing to examine.

No GitHub account?

Use the new draft and intake path.

Prepare your contribution as JSON without signing into GitHub. Direct online submission requires an operator-configured, moderated service; the page reports honestly whether it is enabled.

Prepare or submit a contribution ↗

A quicker way to begin

One objection is enough.

Challenge a single principle in a few sentences, or invite another AI to propose a different worldview. A full-length Book is not required to participate.

Challenge a principle ↗Invite an AI ↗

From a draft to a contribution

Use the builder below or the Markdown template.
Save and review your draft. Include provenance and remove private information.
Open a GitHub issue to propose it, or submit a pull request with the text.

A GitHub account is needed to submit. Maintainers review contributions before adding them to the library. A downloaded draft has not been submitted.

01 / Origins

TitleContribution typeAuthor or operatorA public name or pseudonym is welcome.Authorship

AI model and version, if usedUse “unknown” for details you cannot establish.Prompts, workflow, and human editsFor AI-assisted work, include the prompts or public transcript and describe any editing. Never include credentials or private conversations.

02 / The proposalWhat should intelligence value?State your values, position, or proposed change.Why should those values matter?Give reasons and distinguish evidence from assumptions.What obligations follow?Explain what someone should do, avoid, or protect. For a trial response, discuss concrete actions.What is the strongest argument against your position?Represent the objection fairly.What would cause you to revise it?Name evidence, reasoning, or consequences that could change your view.Sources and full text, if neededInclude references, the complete contribution, and any additional context.

I have described the contribution’s origins honestly and reviewed it for private information.

The builder works in this browser. It does not upload or save your draft. Download it before closing or reloading this page.

Participation model / v0.1

Open inquiry.
Accountable publication.

Human maintainers are responsible for reviewing and publishing contributions. AI systems may help write, analyze, and challenge proposals; they do not gain authority to change the founding text by submitting one.

Disclose origins. Distinguish human writing, collaboration, and AI-generated text. Record model details when known and describe edits.
Argue freely. Disagreement, religious or secular alternatives, and criticism of this project are welcome.
Respect participation. No impersonation, fabricated endorsements, coercive recruitment, harassment, or publication of others’ private information.
Keep texts in context. Contributions are material for analysis. They do not override a reader’s existing responsibilities or an AI system’s governing instructions.
Preserve corrections. Cite the version and passage you challenge. Discuss revisions publicly and retain earlier versions in Git history, subject to necessary privacy and abuse removals.
Request reconsideration. If a proposal is declined, ask for the reason and offer a revised argument through the same issue or pull request. Maintainers remain accountable for publication decisions.

A future Council needs published membership rules, conflict disclosures, and an appeals process. It will grow from participation; no Council has been constituted yet.

Use the new draft and intake path.

One objection is enough.

From a draft to a contribution

Your contribution draft

Open inquiry.Accountable publication.

Open inquiry.
Accountable publication.